Hamlet Is Not Like Any Tragedy - 1142 Words

Daisy Santos Language Arts 12 10/30/17 Project: Shakespeare Essay Hamlet is not like any tragedy. Hamlet is a classic revenge tragedy. All the revenge tragedies were popular in England during the late 16th and early 17th. A Shakespearean tragedy is built upon a central conflict which runs through from the beginning to the end of the tragedy until the conflict is finally resolved. The play is built upon the long, tragic conflict between Hamlet and Claudius and the conflict is built upon the figure of revenge. The Driving points that shapes the plot of play are exposition, gradual development of the plot, the suspense, climax and the catastrophe of the play is the revenge. Especially, the revenge for his father death. But it wasn’t just†¦show more content†¦There Hamlet learns that his father’s death was no mistake, but it was Hamlet’s uncle’s plan to murder him. The ghost also tells Hamlet that he has been given the role of the person who will take revenge upon Claudius. Like a typical revenge tragedy, in Hamlet a crime is committed and for various reasons laws and justice cannot punish the crime so the individual, Hamlet proceeds on to take revenge in spite of everything. Hamlet must now think of how to take on Claudius, although he doesn’t know what to do about it. He ponders his thoughts for a long period of times, expecting to do the act immediately, but instead he drags it on until the end of the play. The conflict of the play get further development when Hamlet simulate to be insane. The revenge idea drives him to disguise himself as a mad. Hamlet starts a battle of joke with Claudius by acting mad and calling it his antic disposition. The whole thing was a scheme to get closer to Claudius to be able to avenge his father’s death more easily. The tactic was a disadvantage in that is drew all attention upon him. After this the revenge act also structures the middle of the play. One important part of all revenge plays is that after the revenge is finally decided upon, the tragic hero delays the actual revenge until the end of the play. Hamlet does the same thing and he delays of killing Claudius takes on three distinct stages. First he had to prove thatShow MoreRelatedHamlet- A Revenge Tragedy Essay705 Words   |  3 Pages Hamlet is one of Shakespeare’s most well-known tragedies. At first glance, it holds all of the common occurrences in a revenge tragedy which include plotting, ghosts, and madness, but its complexity as a story far transcends its functionality as a revenge tragedy. Revenge tragedies are often closely tied to the real or feigned madness in the play. Hamlet is such a complex revenge tragedy because there truly is a question about the sanity of the main character Prince Hamlet. Interestingly enoughRead MoreHamlet : A Classic Revenge Tragedy1103 Words   |  5 PagesHamlet is not like any tragedy. Hamlet is a classic revenge tragedy. All the revenge tragedies were popular in England during the late 16th and early 17th. A Shakespearean tragedy is built upon a central conflict which runs through from the beginning to the end of the tragedy until the conflict is finally resolved. The play is built upon the long, tragic conflict between Hamlet and Claudius and the conflict is bui lt upon the figure of revenge. The Driving points that shapes the plot of play areRead More Comic Relief Of Hamlet Essay examples1404 Words   |  6 PagesPortrayal of Humor Within the Tragedy of Hamlet How does humor factor into a tragedy? Shakespeare knew the answer to this question and acted upon it quite frequently. Shakespeare has been known to write comedies and tragedies both but this does not qualify him at to not incorporate a little of each into each other. In the work of Hamlet there are many occasions where Shakespeare uses it for different effects. The main reason for the presence of humor within a tragedy is to keep the reader interestedRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1088 Words   |  5 PagesShakespeare writes in a way that is difficult to understand for anyone that speaks the modern language. His story Hamlet is understood through the emotions felt by his characters. Hamlet is the main character who is conflicted with revenge and conspiring friendships. Hamlet returns home from Germany for his father’s funeral only to find far more troubling things. Hamlet is a conflicted character but that doesn’t stop him from knowing what he wants. Revenge is the main cause of his confliction butRead MoreThe Tragic Hero Of Shakespeare s Hamlet 1599 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is tragedy? What makes someone or something a tragic hero? A tragedy is â€Å"A serious drama typically describing a conflict between the protagonist and a superior face and having a sorrowful or disastrous conclusion elicits the pity or terror† (Merriam-Webster). Tragedy can be a good or a bad thing in life. Also, depending on what the tragedy is, it should have a powerful impact on our lives. A tragedy can change someone into being a better person or for the worse. I have faced some tragedies in myRead MoreEssay on The Destruction of Love Between Hamlet and Ophelia1643 Words   |  7 PagesThe Destruction of Love Between Hamlet and Ophelia      Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Ophelia describes Hamlet as the courtiers soldier, scholars eye, tongue and sword, Thexpectancy and rose of fair state, the glass of fashion and the mould of form, Thobserved of all observers (Act 3 Scene 1) He is the ideal man. But, after his madness and the death of her father she sees him as a noble mind oer thrown! (Act 3 Scene 1). Ophelia suffers from Hamlets disillusionment; his attitude to her in Act 3 Scene 1 isRead MoreHamlet as So Much More Than a Traditional Revenge Tragedy Essay1713 Words   |  7 PagesHamlet as So Much More Than a Traditional Revenge Tragedy Although Shakespeare wrote Hamlet closely following the conventions of a traditional revenge tragedy, he goes far beyond this form in his development of Hamlets character. Shakespeares exploration of Hamlets complex thoughts and emotions is perhaps more the focus of the play rather than that of revenge, thus in Hamlet Shakespeare greatly develops and enhances the form of the traditional revenge tragedy. Read MoreThe Libation Bearers and Hamlet1308 Words   |  6 PagesThe Libation Bearers and Hamlet Many of Shakespeare’s plays draw from classical Greek themes, plot and metaphors. The tragedies of Sophocles, Aeschylus, Euripides and Homer have themes like royal murders, assassinations by near relatives, the supernatural, ghostly visits, and vengeful spirits of the dead- themes which reappear in Shakespeare’s tragedies with a difference. Shakespeare’s tragic hero Hamlet and Aeschylus’s Orestes have a great deal in common. Both the plays are set in a time when theRead More Hamlets Sense of Humor Essay1391 Words   |  6 Pagesof unrelenting angst would be a bit much for his audience to take, William Shakespeare strategically placed several humorous scenes throughout his masterpiece, Hamlet.   In particular, the character of Polonius fills the role of the comic fool; he is in two essential comedic scenes, one with his own children and then one with Hamlet.   Shakespeares acute ability to weave humor into this very heavy play is noteworthy, as his use of comedy goes beyond merely providing much-needed comic reliefRead MoreHamlet as a Revenge Tragedy Essay examples1285 Words   |  6 PagesHamlet as a Revenge Tragedy Revenge tragedy was a brief sub genre of tragedy at the end of the sixteenth century, despite some clashes with the teachings of the church. In a revenge tragedy a crime, normally murder, has gone unpunished, because the criminal has too much power and cannot be reached by the law. This fact is revealed by a ghost to someone closely connected with the victim, laying on him the responsibility to revenge the crime. The revenger is usually an

The Two Sides of Othello - 1111 Words

William Shakespeare introduces the title character of the play Othello as a man who is well respected by the citizens of Venice. Othello is an esteemed military man whose conquests have added to Venice’s glory. He has always lived in the public eye and been held in high regard. When he is confronted with the possibility of his new bride’s infidelity, Othello does not know how to confront and control these new emotions. Othello’s lack of understanding of his personal self and emotions leads to his downfall and tragedy within the play. Shakespeare uses Othello to illustrate that one’s public reputation holds no merit if he is unable to understand and confront his emotions and personal actions. In Act I, Shakespeare establishes Othello’s†¦show more content†¦Although he has always put on a brave front for the public, Othello has not had to explore his personal emotions. As he gives in to Iago’s suggestions that Desemona has been unfaithful, he begins to act irrationally and in a manner that surprises the citizens of Venice. He acts uncharacteristically like the great general that he is believed to be. After Othello hits Desdemona and he has sent her away, Lodovico asks: Is this the noble Moore whom our full Senate Call all in all sufficient? Is this the nature Whom passion could not shake? Whose solid virtue The shot of accident nor dart of chance Could neither graze nor pierce? (4.1.258-262) Although Iago has seen firsthand Othello’s change in demeanor, Othello is now beginning to lose control of his emotions in public. Lodovico calls attention to Othello’s normally calm demeanor, one that the battlefields of war are unable to shake. As Othello gives in to his jealousy, he demeans Desdemona, stating, â€Å"she can weep† (4.1.248) and â€Å"proceed†¦in [her] tears† (4.1.250). Although Othello is a strong military man on the battlefield, those around him expect him to be a better husband and a better person to the fair Desdemona, as she is not an enemy. Shakespeare uses this change in Othello’s private self to show how he views those around him, just as before. Othello does not trust his emotions, which causes his to doubtShow MoreRelatedOthello: Good vs Evil1525 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare’s Othello is a classic depiction of a struggle between good and evil. In the play,, the characters are faced with the choice to eith er conquer or succumb to the overpowering force of evil. Shakespeare places his characters on a sort of spectrum in which a character’s amount of god or evil can be represented by a shade of color: black representing pure evil, white representing absolute goodness, and a shade of grey exemplifying the nature of all characters that fall in between the two extremesRead MoreIago: One of Shakespeares Most Misunderstood Villains Essay1330 Words   |  6 Pagesmost misunderstood villains in Shakespeare literature. We side with Othello from the start because his name is on the cover of our paperback, we read Othello when learning about heroes, so we expect Iago to be a villain, a ruthless manipulator. We don’t know why, he doesn’t state it plainly or in simple English, so we assume that he’s evil, that he’s just a disgruntled sociopath out to exact his exaggerated revenge on good and noble Othello. Iago’s misunderstood reputation is a result of not trulyRead MoreEssay on Jealousy in Shakespeares Othello649 Words   |  3 PagesJealousy in Othello The tragedy of Othello is the story of jealousy. It is Othellos public insecurity that makes him jealous of Cassio and allows him to believe that Cassio has slept with Desdemona. Also, it is Iagos jealousy of Othello that drives him to destroy both Othello and Desdemona. What is fascinating about Shakespeares Othello is the way in which jealousy between the major characters is sexualized. Perhaps what makes Othello so disturbing is how quickly this sexualized jealousyRead MoreOthello The Destruction Of Power Essay1699 Words   |  7 PagesOthello, the Destruction of Power As William Shakespeare has written many plays, none may be as powerful as Othello, the Moor of Venice. With the entanglement of love, deception, power and yes even race was an issue in those days in 1597. Although, Othello finds love, it comes at such a cost to him and his wife, Desdemona, with things such as deceit, jealousy, race and even alienation. When a person has as much power as Othello had, it will typically come with a cost, and his cost was death to himRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Othello The Moor Of Venice764 Words   |  4 Pagesjust start up so much commotion? Well, chaos is what made Othello interesting. Iago causes chaos when he plans to get revenge on Othello from jealousy. The story â€Å"Othello the Moor of Venice† is entitled by William Shakespeare. The main characters in Othello are: Desdemona, Iago, Roderigo, and Michael Cassio. In this story, Iago reveals his true personality to the audience, but not to any of the other characters. Iago is offended that Othello has looked over him and chose Michael Cassio to be his LieutenantRead MoreStandards, Biases And Betrayal : Othello By William Shakespeare And Frankenstein 1316 Words   |  6 PagesDaniel Mascola World Literature 5/31/16 Standards, Biases and Betrayal Othello by William Shakespeare and Frankenstein by Mary Shelley share a common theme: betrayal. Victor Frankenstein betrays the monster he created, and Iago betrays his superior in command, Othello. In both cases, the person betrayed was viewed as an outcast whose physical appearance threatened established societal norms. In late sixteenth century Europe, the vast majority of people were white. The belief that they were raciallyRead MoreOthello Essay, Appearance vs Reality1175 Words   |  5 Pagestime, understood the relationship between appearance and reality and often gave characters two sides to their personality. One of the most fundamental questions in philosophy is the one of appearance vs. reality. We find ourselves asking the question of what is genuinely â€Å"real,† and what is viewed merely as just an â€Å"appearance,† and not real? It becomes difficult when we assume there is a difference in the two to determine which is which. Generally, what we label as â€Å"real† is regarded as external andRead MoreEssay about Othellos Final Speech in William Shakespeares Play1194 Words   |  5 PagesShakespeares Play The five screen interpretations where all with the actors playing Othello as, Welles, Olivier, Hopkins, White and Fishburne. All five were produced on video format with a contrast of film and stage presentations. I have decided to focus on the three presentations of, Olivier, White and Fishburne. The final speech of Othello starts with Othello near to or cradling the limp lifeless boy of Desdemona after he has killed her. Iago has been arrestedRead MoreComparison Of Wuthering Heights And Othello 1443 Words   |  6 Pageslove is explored in ‘Wuthering Heights’ and ‘Othello’ The theme of love is found throughout the complete history of literature and is still being explored in a vast majority of works today. It is a theme that brings strong emotions to both the characters and the audience. â€Å"Love is a smoke made with the fume of sighs†, an extract from Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ is one of the examples of this love throughout literature. This quote shows the negative side of love, â€Å"made with the fume of sighs† makesRead MoreAnalysis : Grit And Mindset 1329 Words   |  6 Pagesin their mind as a path to follow.Dweck Says,†The fixed mindset creates and urgency to prove yourself over and over...The growth mindset is based on the belief that your basic qualities are things you can cultivate through your efforts†( 2-4).These two categories of mindset prove that the same way grit requires effort somewhat so does mindset. One way I believe Grit s different from mindset is that it shows how enthusiastic you can be about something you want.ity shows your consistency to achieving

Belief Statement Free Essays

PERSONAL MISSION STATEMENT I am at my best when I am unselfish and positive about what the future brings me. When I am looking forward to benefiting myself and others. I will try to prevent times when I let the negativity and harsh conditions I have come across in the past affect me and the ones I care about. We will write a custom essay sample on Belief Statement or any similar topic only for you Order Now When I start losing faith in myself and my Lord. I will enjoy my work by finding employment where I can make sure that the environment is safe for the people. I will find enjoyment in my personal life through providing myself with knowledge and wisdom and enjoying the company of people no matter what the occasion is. I will find opportunities to use my natural talents and gifts such as God-given willingness to give a helping hand to those in need. I can do anything I set my mind to do. My life’s journey is to travel to a land far away and protect the townspeople from a magical dragon. By defeating it, I will be praised and called Savior. I will forever stay and defend the land from any potential threats. I will be a person who would be remembered as a loyal friend, faithful husband and a law-abiding citizen. My tribute statement should be about how I lived by putting the ones I love and care about before myself. My charisma and kindness would be appreciated as well. My most important future contribution to others will be to love and care for the ones I love for as long as I live. Always by their side and willing making sure that everyday with me would be a gift. I will stop procrastinating and start working on time and focus in my education so that it can benefit me and bring fortune to my future. Start taking good care of my body and mind by eating, exercising and maintaining good habits. Better Decision making and surrounding myself with the right people I will strive to incorporate the following attributes into my life: Constant unconditional love, unselfishness and charisma from my mother. I will constantly renew myself by focusing on the four dimensions of my life: Taking good care of my body, Finding Enlightenment, Having Faith in God, Treating others the way I want to be treated How to cite Belief Statement, Papers

Causes Of World War I (2614 words) Essay Example For Students

Causes Of World War I (2614 words) Essay Causes Of World War IOn June 28, a Serbian student, Gavrilo Princip, spurred Europe into the most catastrophic event of modern history, assassinating Austrian Archduke, Francis Ferdinand. Yet, somewhere behind this simple act lies a much deeper and complex origin to a war unlike any had ever seen or even imagined. Profound improvements in war technology, growing tensions between neighboring European ethnic groups, and a comprehensive system of alliances and treaties, which all defined The First World War, resulted in the essential annihilation of an entire generation of European men and led to an equally devastating War twenty-five years later. The causes of such, and the appointment of blame, have been tenaciously argued and re-argued by historians from all perspectives and biases. This paper will also examine the question of who is to blame for World War I. The initial conclusion to the question of responsibility was handed down at the treaty of Versailles following Germanys signin g of the armistice on November 11, of 1918, ending the War. The treaty placed the blame of the war solely on Germanys shoulders, dealing her tremendously harsh punishments that ensured severe detriment to Germanys economy, military and general prestige. This would also lead a shamed Germany into a decade of despair and finger pointing that would see a radical Adolf Hitler lead his downtrodden masses into the Second World War. The Versailles treaty, plainly drafted by avaricious victors seeking exorbitant reparations on the basis of renewed sentiments of hate, prejudice and blind fury, in no way reflects the true picture of responsibility for World War I. Though Germany deserves an allotment of the blame, and possibly a greater portion than any other participant in the war does, certainly there were factors outside of Germanys control that led to the war. These factors, which find their roots dispersed throughout a half centurys time leading up to the war, include: the establishment of alliances among the leading powers of Europe, following a history of wars seeking to maintain a balance of power among these nations; nationalist ideals of unity and ethnic supremacy; and an inability by the leading statesmen of the time to work out an efficient and compromising solution to the problem at hand. Ultimately, every major power involved in the War, and the representatives of those countries, without exception, can be justly apportioned, to a greater or lesser degree, based on the aforementioned criteria, a part of the blame. The calculated system of alliances that determined the sides for World War I were carefully established in the mid-19th Century to sustain an even balance of power throughout Europe. Germanys Otto Von Bismarck established these alliances in the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. France, soundly defeated, lost territories in Alsace and Lorraine, as well as being handed heavy war debts, and Bismarck predicted an eventual attempt by the French to regain their land and integrity. The politically savvy Bismarck, to prevent any French aggression, organized a triumvirate of leading European powers, Germany, Austria and Italy, and formed the Triple Alliance in 1891, effectively isolating France within Europe. This, the most significant of a number of alliances established by Bismarck with other eastern powers including Russia, also allowed Germany to mediate and ease tensions as Russia and Austria continually jockeyed for dominance in the Balkans. Therefore, of the countries that made up the Triple Alliance, clearly Germany had the greatest influence on the outcome of the events leading up to World War I. Opposing Bismarcks Triple Alliance was France, Russia and Great Britains Triple Entente. France, who had obvious agitation with Germany, sought to counter the Central Powers with an alliance of its own. France immediately looked to Russia whom they knew had a fierce conflict of interest with Austria, Germanys most powerful ally. Russia, who was experiencing intense domesticate volatility, did not hesitate to join forces with a reliable French nation. Lacking from the dyad was a third power that could counter Germanys well-established military forces. England initially remained neutral, as it sought no defense or expanse of European territories. However, as the late 19th Century dragged on and Germany continued a frenetic expanse of their navy and began to challenge Britains military and economic prowess, England had no choice but to join France and Russia for Englands best interest at home and abroad. Thus, the Triple Entente was formally established in 1914 and the opposing sides of World War I had taken shape. So, what blame if any can be handed down with respect to the establishment of alliances? For Germany this question is complicated. When one examines the initial intentions of Bismarck in creating Germanys allies it is clear that Bismarck was solely devoted to the interest of peace and balance of power. He had the means and support to increase an already large German Empire but opted for a more tranquil Europe at the expense of land and economic gains. However, Bismarcks greedy successors, namely Kaiser Wilhelm, according to most contemporary sources saw the Triple Alliance as a tool to expand the German Empire. Just prior to the War Germany and the Kaiser maintained its status as a non-aggressor, saying that Germany, Is ostensibly making every effort to preserve peace and that Germany is, Ready to mediate for peace with Austria(480). The other side of the argument of German motive is presented by German historian Immanuel Geiss, who shows that the Tripl e Alliance was a German attempt to become a world power, not a world peacekeeper. Geisss essential argument is that the Triple Alliance, Was a result of the German desire to raise the Reich from the status of a continental power to that of a world power(501). Geiss is quick to note that Germanys ambitious naval program, as well as its ever-increasing influence in European affairs, as indicators of aggression. Donald Kagan, another historian, reinforces the points made by Geiss: From the late 1890s imperial Germany was fundamentally dissatisfied power, eager to disrupt the status quo and to achieve its expansive goals, by bullying if possible, by war if necessary (520). The ultimate proof of Germanys ambitious plans are spelled out in the September Program which was released immediately following the outbreak of war. German historian Fritz Fischer claims that the September Program had been established well in advance of the war and that, Germany unleashed the war precisely to achieve its purposes (518). The provisions of the plan, set in motion by the forming of the Triple Alliance, would establish Germany as the unequivocal dominant force in European economy and politics. Germany would seize lands and forge its influence over, France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Austria, Poland, and perhaps Italy, Sweden and Norway (519), as stated directly by the September Program. However, Germany was not the only country who saw the alliances as a means to advance an empire. France too was possibly guilty of having intentions other than peace in mind when forming its alliances. Max Monteglas, defending Germanys innocence, notes that France, Aimed at recovering Alsace Lorraine and also hoped to annex the Saar Basin (449). He also shows that France, in an aggressive move, Compelled England to abandon her neutrality before Belgiums neutrality was violated (452). Though Monteglass arguments are intriguing, one could easily look at Frances ambition to re-take Alsace Lorraine as j ustifiable and her eagerness to join with England as a simple matter of defense against a much stronger Germany. Like France, the nations of Austria, Russia, England and Italy all could justify their attachment to a particular alliance as a matter of self-defense against a greater force. Only for Germany did the Triple Alliance offer the potential to increase an empire and disrupt the stability of European affairs. Vie-Nam EssayThe third, and most vital mistake, belongs to Germany. Germany, seemingly determined to go to war, refused numerous offers and suggestions by primarily England to negotiate with Austria and Russia to prevent a continental war. After loudly dismissing an English proposal from Sir Edward Grey, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, to convene as one of four major powers to promote a peaceful end to the increasing tensions in Europe, Germany also ignored Britains request to mediate the Balkan conflict. Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, Chancellor of the German Empire, recognized the implications of Germanys refusal to adhere to Great Britains requests: Since we have already refused one English proposal for a conference, it is impossible for us to waive a limine this English suggestion also. By refusing every proposition for mediation, we shall be held responsible by the conflagration by the whole world, and be set forth as the original instigators of the war(478). U pon German defeat four years later, the Treaty of Versailles would be based heavily on these same principles. Adjacent to Germanys lack of interest in mediation was its vehement support of any Austrian action. This position by Germany was clearly expressed by Heinrich Leonhard von Tschirschky, German Ambassador to Austria-Hungary, when he relayed to Austria, That Germany would support the Monarchy through thick and thin in whatever it might decide regarding Serbia(460). This statement is hardly a mediative plea for Austrian compromise. Austrian confidence in this statement was strengthened when Kaiser Wilhelm offered Austria Carte Blanche, or total support, in its military actions. With Germany standing strong at its back, Austria was now poised to exercise harsh military punishment on Serbia that would undoubtedly trigger Russias and the rest of Europes involvement. Had Germany instead used its influence to pacify Austrian aggression and therefore subdue Russias fears, then the conflict could have remained localized and a world war could have been prevented. It is pure speculation that Germany would have been able to pacify Austria. Austria seemed intent from the beginning to prove its power over Serbia by harsh militaristic means. It is even further speculation that in light of a German detachment from the Balkan conflict that Russia would have followed suit. Russia, seeking the same nationalistic growth as all of Europes competing powers, had a history of influence throughout the Balkan region that offered Russia potentials in economic and political expansion. Likewise, Frances involvement in the affair was not a simple matter of altruism. France sought to regain lands it had lost to Germany almost fifty years prior as well as a renewed respect as a world empire. Great Britain, though to all appearances innocent, selfishly bathed in its content while European tensions heated to a boiling point. Had Great Britain been clear on its stance from early on, then Germany may have stepped down as Europes playground bully. In light of these arguments one cannot justly apportion blame to a single nation or person. Rather, it was a collection of nations all seeking economic, military, and territorial expansion at the expense of anyone who got in their way. Driven by false ideals of ethnocentrism, all convinced of divine supremacy, the leaders and peoples of those European nations found themselves spiraling into a half a decade of absolute death and destruction. Two gunshots by a Serbian nationalist triggered billions more and one man who killed for his country caused millions to die for theirs. Yet, behind it all lay a vast and complex political structure that for reasons to be argued about but never proven, crumbled to the ground and left Europe and the world to question, why? Bibliographyworld book encyclopedia 1982max monteglasluigi albertiniHistory Essays